Uncategorized

Dime-Store Delicacy

Before we launch into today’s review, let me share a spooky discovery that’s appropriate for the season.

I am currently visiting the town of Mendocino (pop: 731) on California’s northern coast. Today I happened upon a forlorn place called Evergreen Cemetery. Despite its lush-sounding name, Evergreen occupies a couple of dusty acres of arid land and dead weeds on the edge of town.

“Nevergreen” Cemetery. (I decided to present my photo in black and white to make it spookier.)

Off to one side of the cemetery is an interesting grave marker: It’s a stone column maybe three feet in diameter, which has the appearance of being truncated by some kind of earthquake or act of vandalism. Upon closer inspection, it seems the marker was designed merely to look like the top had broken off. I guess it was an artistic choice.

Broken Baluster

The inscription on the marker reads:

Cinderella P. Rueckert

Died

Oct. 7, 1921

Now that’s an interesting name, on an interesting marker, for someone who died almost exactly 103 years ago. I figured I’d research the back story.

I couldn’t find her obit; just this legal notice she placed as “executrix” after her husband died.

It seems Cinderella was her real name (her mother is said to have been a fan of fairy tales), and she was born in 1840 (exact date unknown) in Illinois (city unknown). She came to Mendocino and married a watchman at the local sawmill in 1875. She was widowed in 1888, and supposedly inherited a small fortune. She spent her remaining 33 years living in a house the street from the cemetery, selling apples from her trees to passersby.

Cinderella’s house still stands today!

Now, here’s the spooky part: She was a ghost! Sort of. We now turn to the Kelley House Museum website for details:

“A Swedish lumberman…liked to use Evergreen Cemetery as a shortcut home from town. He would become inebriated and sing at the top of his lungs in the middle of the night passing Cinderella’s home. She got so irritated she found a newly-dug grave awaiting a burial service the next day, bedecked herself in a sheet, then crouched in the grave awaiting the wandering drunk. She popped out of the grave whooping and screaming, and you can be sure the man never shortcut through the graveyard again.”

Let me end with a photo from the back deck of my hotel. I tell you, this is one of the eeriest towns I’ve visited outside of Pennsylvania!

Now it’s time to get down to business. Today we’re checking out the “Happy Halloween Russell Stover Pumpkin Caramel.” Or at least that’s how I read the jumble of words scattered across the packaging.

Alert readers will recall that we’ve examined Russell Stover “confections” in the past. But this Caramel version seems to have escaped our notice. Until now. Let’s apply our rating rubric!

Conceptual Soundness: Russell Stover Candies began in 1923 as “Mrs. Stover’s Bungalow Candies,” and specialized in selling boxed chocolates brings bargain prices. This was just two years after See’s Candy was launched. I can’t find any information about their rivalry, but I’ve always felt that Russell Stover’s is the cheaper, everyman candy. Where See’s sells through an exclusive network of their own stores, Russell Stover’s seems to be available at every drugstore in the country. That in itself would appear to be a legit marketing strategy, trading exclusivity for ubiquity.

Mrs. Stover’s actual bungalow, in Kansas City, around 1930.

This particular candy is part of Russell Stover’s pumpkin series. They are chocolate pumpkin shapes filled with different kinds of gooey candy. They are clearly marketed for Halloween, sold individually at a reasonable price, and decorated with an illustration of a smiling jack o’lantern. Overall, it’s a solid concept. 4 points.

Appearance of the Treat: It’s your standard Russell Stover’s foil packaging. It features a nose-less, buck-toothed pumpkin with an expression like Don Knotts in his dotage. It’s not exactly an image suitable for Rod Serling’s Night Gallery, but it is colorful and evocative of Halloween.

But then you remove the packaging and are faced with the candy itself. I know I’ve ranted about this in the past, but it bears repeating: there is an inexcusable, possibly criminal, disconnect between the image on the package and the actual product within. This brown blob is evocative of meconium. 1 point.

Taste. I have to admit, this is a toothsome Halloween candy. There’s a satisfying crack of the chocolate shell when you first bite into it, and then there’s the pleasant mouthfeel as you masticate the chocolate together with the caramel filling. That caramel is surprisingly tasty, without the chemical notes that one often associates with cheap drugstore candy. It’s got a bit of a Snickers vibe going on, without the nuts. I’ll give it 3.5 points.

Value. These are a buck each at our local CVS. What other chocolate-adjacent candy product could you get for that price? Most of the similar candies weigh in at just ounce, so this gives you 30 percent more candy. I’m sure you’d get tired of eating these all the time, but as a single treat, $1 is a definite bargain. 4 points.

Total Treat Score: 11.5/16 points

Get one today! Chances are they’re available within walking distance of wherever you are!

Uncategorized

We have a winner!

(Plus some October news…)

I must admit that one of you sent me the correct answer to the Guess Where I Am quiz just hours after my first post. But before I honor our winner(s), let me share with you the two remaining photos I was going to post if a few more days passed without a winner:

Yes, the correct answer is Rome–a city known for its cats. So the cat theme in my photos was a hint. But if no one clued in on it, I figured that “lost cat” flyer written in Italian would give away my location. (The striking-looking black cat in the penultimate photo was hanging out on the Appian Way. He was one of about a dozen cats that I saw on my walk, and most were just looking for a scratch under the chin. Here’s another one:

Anyway, loyal reader Detlef K correctly identified my location simply from that first photo of a large sculpture of a black cat. Detlef calls it a “voluptuous cat,” and discovered that the artist has an exhibit in Rome. So kudos to him!!

Voluptuous Cat

Special recognition also goes to loyal reader Ron P, who nailed it when I posted the second photo (of a painting of a cat seated at the feet of a bearded old man). Evidently Ron sensed the Italian vibe in the painting–or maybe he saw the “cat” theme emerging and thought of Rome.

Childless Cat Grandpa

Honorable mention goes to loyal reader Rev Deb, who correctly identified Piazza San Lorenzo as the site of Voluptuous Cat. Either she knows a lot about art or she’s skilled with Google Image Search. Either way, she’s not eligible to play as she already knew I was going to Rome.

Thank you everyone who participated! I will be back in The States next week, assuming I don’t first expire from taking in about 3 packs a day of second-hand smoke.

Hallow-Month begins in 10 days!

Once again I will be turning over this blog to daily Ghost Posts (TM) throughout the month of October. This year I’m broadening the theme beyond Halloween and spookiness, to also include anything pumpkin-related. Details will appear soon. Break out the candy corn and enjoy the month with this blog!

Also, we’ll have a big announcement in early October about Poe Fest in Baltimore. There’s a lot going on next month–you won’t want to miss a single post!

Until then, ciao/miao!

Uncategorized

ADW Part 8

The next morning I awoke with a most peculiar feeling, and I immediately resolved to share my latest thoughts on our immortality experiments and the public presentation thereof. These thoughts were so recent that they had not yet fully formed in my mind, but I nevertheless went to my study (which had become Prof. Glauben’s bedroom) with the full intention of announcing my new opinions as they revealed themselves to me.

When I entered the room, which was bathed in the soft sunlight of morning, I saw the earthly remains of Prof. Glauben occupying the armchair in the same position in which I had left him the previous night. I walked over to the skeleton, a pleasant smile on my face, and listened to myself speak.

“My dear Professor, upon careful consideration, I have chosen to accept your suggestion that we present our discovery–and yourself–to a suitable audience.” The skull inclined upward to me with, I imagined, a look of bewilderment. “Does you mean zhis, Venwick?” I searched for a reply, but I was not even certain of what I had just said. My mouth, however, replied immediately. “Of course I mean it,” I heard myself say, “and the presentation shall be tomorrow night.” Prof. Glauben’s skull displayed an expression of disbelief, then of hope, and finally of elation. He jumped up from the chair and embraced me with his cold, bony arms. “You have chosen vell, mein boy! Sank you! Ve vill be famous und revered scientists!”

I must admit that I was affected by the emotion of the moment. I was pleased that I had lifted my friend from his misery. To look back on the conditions under which the poor creature suffered touched my heartstrings, and it hurt me worse to remember that so much of it was brought about by me. He had spent time in prison, not I, though we were both equally guilty of our wretched volunteer’s death. He alone had to suffer the horrors of a premature burial. He had been forced, by me, from the solitude and peace of the grave, only so that he could hide as a recluse away from his fellow man. And to make his misery complete, I had tried to deny him some much-deserved recognition of his work. It was with relief, therefore, that I now assured his tormented bones that I would begin making immediate preparations for tomorrow’s presentation, with him as the guest of honor. I went to bed that evening much relieved, yet with a vague feeling of dark foreboding.

PART 9 WILL APPEAR ON FRIDAY