2024 Halloween treats · Halloween · Puns

It’s Easy Being Green

Today’s Halloween-themed spotting is at the home of son Ian and daughter-in-law Katelyn. It’s a 12-foot skeleton that makes even me feel short. Note his smaller companions lounging on the porch. What, that’s not scary enough for you? Then check out the scene at night:

Even more spooky: The skeletons on the porch have fleshed out!

Note how the scene becomes spookier with the addition of unexpected color–in this case, the red and blue light that washes over the whole scene.

The folks at Mars, Inc. seem to understand this principle, and have applied it to the inveterate Snickers bar. Specifically, in an effort to dress up the candy bar for Halloween, they have changed the color of the nougat from light tan to “ghoulish green.” Let’s determine whether this is a trick or a treat.

Conceptual Soundness: Many food purveyors will try to goose sales by giving their product a holiday tweak. Examples include red and green M&Ms, green beer, and eggnog ice cream. Such moves are intended to renew interest in the product and create a sense of ephemeral exlusivity. In this case, Mars has taken a classic candy bar that everyone knows well, and added green food coloring to the nougat. It’s definitely different and does radiate a bit of a Halloween vibe. That’s worth 3 points.

Appearance of the Treat: The most noticeable difference is the green wrapper. And in case you’re colorblind, they print the words “Ghoulish Green” just under the traditional Snickers logo. Now, I’m not sure there’s anything “ghoulish” about green. I assume the word choice had more to do with alliteration.

If you remove the wrapper, the candy bar looks identical to any other Snickers bar you’ve eaten. But bite into it (or cut it in half, as I did) and you see that the nougat is the exact same shade of green as the wrapper.

Now, these are “fun size” bars, which means they’re less than an ounce. You probably will eat it in two bites. So that leaves just those few moments between the first and second bite to admire (or even notice) the green nougat. Still, it’s novel, and the color is truly putrid. As a Halloween gag (if you’ll pardon the pun), it’s worth 3 points.

Taste: These taste exactly the same as any other Snicker’s bar. The “ghoulish green” nougat has no impact on the flavor. Now, in my opinion, the Snickers bar is a delicious candy, with the ideal balance of caramel, nougat, chocolate, and peanuts. But if you’re going to hype a candy as being redesigned for Halloween, shouldn’t you also give it a new taste? Maybe a little mint, which is suggested by the green color? Or substitute pistachios for the peanuts? The people at Mars missed a huge opportunity here. Treats sporting a different look should taste different.

Now, I should probably admit here that, to me, Halloween Oreos, with their orange filling, taste much better than regular Oreos. I realize the package says “same great taste,” and the ingredient list is identical to regular Oreos. But somehow I find the Halloween Oreos to be far tastier than the regular ones. I am open to the possibility that the visual appearance of the Halloween Oreo somehow tricks my brain into thinking I’m tasting something different. But that’s OK. As we know, the placebo effect can cause genuine health improvements in clinical trials. So, as far as I’m concerned, if I think the Halloween Oreos taste better, then they taste better.

“Same great taste” my ass; these taste much better than the run-of-the-mill Oreos.

Anyway, my point is simply that the “ghoulish green” Snickers do not taste any different than regular Snickers. So I can’t give them any points for taste. Zero points.

Value: The fun-size “ghoulish green” Snickers come in a bag that also includes “ghoulish green” Twix bars. You get 35 bars to a bag, which costs $12 on sale at Safeway. That works out to 35 cents per bar, which really isn’t bad. Let’s give it 3 points.

Total Treat Score: 9/16 points. If you like Snickers, then you should get yourself a bag.

Speaking of bags, our mailbag received the following item which is evocative both of The Birds and Poe:

Submitted by loyal reader Peter D.
2024 Halloween treats · churches

Pumpkin on a Pike

Today I’m in Bodega Bay (pop: 912), the setting for Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds. And if that isn’t a good Halloween tie-in, I don’t know what is.

Several of the iconic buildings from the movie are still going strong over 60 years later. Checkitout:

Potter Schoolhouse, then.
Potter Schoolhouse, now.
St Teresa of Avila Church (on right), then.
St Teresa of Avila Church, today.
And of course even non-historic places are trying to get in on the act.
Meanwhile, while we were enjoying coffee on the deck….

Somehow, I managed to get through my cappuccino without having my eyes pecked out, so it’s on to our Treat of the Day:

I happened by one of those independent, upscale candy shops that cling like barnacles to the quaint Main Streets of small, tourism-oriented towns. It was here this pumpkin pop called to me through the window.

I hear and I obey.

This little treat is made by the Mendocino Chocolate Company, and it’s irresistibly adorable. Money was exchanged and moments later I was the proud owner of a pumpkin on a stick.

Conceptual Soundness: This is a white chocolate pumpkin that’s been colored orange and stuck onto a rolled-paper stick. You’ll recall my earlier rant about putting treats on a stick where there’s no logical reason to do so. This is one of those cases. Why couldn’t I just eat the pumpkin candy by hand, as I did with yesterday’s Ghirardelli square? I can’t get behind this creeping stick-iness. Zero points.

Appearance of the Treat: It’s undeniably enchanting. The orange pumpkin head, with well-defined features rendered in chocolate icing, is friendly and slightly quirky. The ribbon is festive, with matching orange jack o’lanterns on a chocolate-brown background. I do now recognize that the stick helps to secure the ribbon, and thus it might not be as superfluous as I initially thought. I’ll give one point back for conceptual soundness. In terms of appearance of the treat, I award the full 4 points.

Taste: Hack! Gag! Never has such a cute candy tasted so revolting. Clearly the “confectioners” (emphasis on the “con” part) decided to pump their “candy” full of wax to aid in the molding process. Eating this pumpkin is reminiscent of eating a candle. I suppose there must be some white chocolate in the pumpkin, just as there must be some worthwhile programming on network TV. But in both cases you need to search for it. While I was gnawing on the edges of the pumpkin the little face seemed to adopt a mocking look, as if to say “who’s the real sucker here?” It would be malpractice for me to award any points for taste. Zero points. In fact, this is so foul, I’m taking back that bonus points I awarded to the stick for supporting the ribbon.

Value: I parted with $2.75 to get this “treat.” Now, to be fair, as a purely visual Halloween prop it’s perfectly delightful. And $2.75 ain’t a bad price if it tasted decent. But it doesn’t. I’ll give it one grudging point.

Total Treat Score: 0 (conceptual soundness) + 4 (appearance) + 1 (stick bonus) + 0 (taste) – 1 (disgust factor) + 1 (value) = 5 points/16 points.

2024 Halloween treats · California history

Lighting the Way

Robert Eggers’ The Lighthouse (2019)

Why are lighthouses so spooky? Because they’re lonely outposts on the edge of civilization? Set amid rocky cliffs and dangerous waves? Because they’re relics of a bygone age? I’m sure all these factors contribute to the eerie mystique of lighthouses, but for me it’s largely because I’ve seen so many movies where they are at the center of something spooky or sinister. Examples include The Lighthouse (2019), The Vanishing (2018), Lighthouse (1999), and Tormented (1960). (This last one I can’t really recommend, unless you’re under the influence.)

Anyway, today I found myself at the Point Cabrillo Lighthouse, just south of Fort Bragg. Some (such as this random person on Trip Advisor) claim this lighthouse and its associated buildings are haunted. If I apply my SpookFilter (TM) to the photo I took this morning (thus converting it to black and white), it does give off a bit of a spooky vibe.

Point Cabrillo Lighthouse: home to ghosts?

What, you don’t agree? Allow me to turn up the SpookFilter a few more notches:

The Point Cabrillo Lighthouse dates back to 1909, and is located near the community of Caspar (which is almost the same as Casper). So there’s that.

Fortunately, I was lucky enough to survive my harrowing visit to the otherworldly Tower of Satan that is Point Cabrillo Lighthouse, and I can now present you with today’s Treat Review. Let’s open a bag of Ghirardelli Pumpkin Spice Caramels!

Ghirardelli is a storied name in the Bay Area, where I grew up. Domenico Ghirardelli was an Italian entrepreneur who came out to California in 1849 as part of the first wave of the Gold Rush. After trying his hand at prospecting for a few months, he shifted to selling supplies and candies to the miners at a store in Stockton and, a little later, in San Francisco. Incredibly, both of his stores burned down within a few days of each other in 1851. Undeterred, the following year Ghirardelli opened a “Chocolate Manufactory” in San Francisco. His company has been in continuous operation to this day.

I’ve always liked Ghirardelli chocolate. The milk chocolate in particular is creamy, rich, smooth, and mellow. Ghirardelli claims to be one of the very few chocolate manufacturers to control every aspect of its manufacturing process. It has a reputation for high and exacting quality. So my expectations for these Halloween/Fall treats are set high!

Conceptual Soundness: They’ve taken their famous milk chocolate, molded it into little flat squares, and filled them with a caramel-pumpkin spice treacle that oozes out when you bite into it. Each is individually wrapped. It’s an attractive treat that’s portable and indulgent. What’s not to like? 4 points.

Appearance of the Treat: Each square is individually wrapped in a foil wrapper with an attractive fall design. The background color is chocolate-brown.

Unwrap one, and you see that the chocolate is imprinted with the Ghirardelli name and logo,which is a nice touch. The edges of the square are a raised frame. The whole thing feels very classy and high-quality. Appearance definitely earns 4 points.

Taste: These squares are a pleasure to eat. The texture is creamy-smooth, but there’s still a good “snap” as you take a bite. Then the chocolate and the filling literally melt in you mouth. The size is ideal for a little after-meal indulgence.

I wasn’t expecting to like the pumpkin spice/caramel filling as much as I did. My low expectations no doubt come from my experience with the Starbucks PSL. It seems that anyone and everyone slaps the “pumpkin spice” label on whatever dreck they’re offering.

Now, Ghirardelli’s use of the word “luscious” to describe the filling seems a little over-the top, but I have to admit it’s delicious. They use “natural pumpkin flavor,” and I definitely detect some cinnamon and nutmeg. This is not the cloying, chemical-y taste that you’d find in Torani syrup or Starbucks drinks. Instead, this filling actually reminds me of pumpkin pie. The caramel, meanwhile, is smooth and low-viscosity, which ensures a good mouthfeel. Let’s give the taste 4 points!

Value: Here’s where the other shoe drops. A 9 oz. bag of these costs about $11 at Safeway. That works out to about $1.22 per ounce, which compares unfavorably to most of the other candies we’ve reviewed. (For example, yesterday’s Russell Stover’s pumpkin was about 76 cents per ounce.) Of course, one expects to pay for quality. Let’s split the difference and award 2 points for value.

Total Treat Score: 14/16 points.

2024 Halloween treats · bridges

Devil Eyez

I made a little visit to Russian Gulch State Park on California’s north coast. Among its highlights is something called “the Devil’s Punchbowl,” which is my Halloween tie-in of the day. It seems there’s a natural tunnel that runs under the park from the ocean side, and it somehow found an outlet through a vertical shaft up to the surface. Ocean water boils up through this opening at high tide. Sadly, the tide was out when I visited. But here’s a photo ripped from the California State Parks website:

Devil’s Punchbowl at high tide.

With a name like Devil’s Punchbowl, this place is naturally said to be haunted. You can find a number of ghost stories online, but be aware there are many places called the Devil’s Punchbowl, both in California and beyond. As an aside, the name “Devil’s Punchbowl” reminds me of the Devil’s Gate Dam in southern California, which I reviewed four years ago.

As is typical for me, attention was drawn from the Punchbowl to something a little less sinister: The Frederick W. Panhorst Bridge, which carries CA Route 1 traffic 100 feet above the surface of the ocean near the Devil’s Punchbowl. Built in 1940, this bridge is made of poured concrete and is over 500 feet long. The bridge looks completely boring and nondescript when viewed through your car window as you drive over it. But if you get down under the bridge, as I did, you can appreciate its classic beauty.

“Mr. DeMille, I’m ready for my closeup.”

My research found that this bridge was constructed as a WPA project. As with most WPA projects, I appreciate that the designers combined functionality with aesthetics. The latter consideration seems to be lacking in so much modern transportation infrastructure.

But let’s get back to Halloween. The day ended up getting away from me, so I’ve enlisted loyal reader Victor R. to provide our Halloween treat review. You may recall his review of a Halloween cookie during our October 2020 treat review suite. He now offers something especially disgusting interesting. Enjoy!

VICTOR R’S GUEST REVIEW:

I visited the Nibblers Popcorn Company store in the Town Center shopping center in El Dorado Hills today.  Nibblers has been open since 2018 and is operated by the Sweeney family, specializing in gourmet popcorns (fancy popcorns like cheddar cheese, parmesan garlic or buffalo wing), and a wide variety of candies (such as classic candy bars, gummy fruits and bubble gum).  My wife Peg suggested that, since I was hunting for a great seasonal treat, I should check out Nibblers and I’m happy to say that, after a less-than-satisfying pumpkin ice cream “treat” at Handel’s Ice Cream Parlor in Folsom, I took her advice and visited it.
First off, kudos to Nibblers for really getting into the Halloween spirit (see the decorations below).  You really feel like it’s Halloween when you walk into the store.  The decorations, tons of candy, and the model train that runs laps around the inside of the store make you feel like a kid again.  The only difference is now you don’t have to ask your parents if you can buy a bunch of candy…you just pull out the old plastic pass to poverty (a.k.a., your credit card), cross your fingers that your purchase won’t be declined, and voila—off you go with your pile of sugary treats!!

This guy eats here all the time, which is why they gave him an official Nibblers  
Popcorn Company shirt to wear!

While at the store, I looked over any number of treats, some of which were seasonally focused, and settled on Herbert’s Best “Gummi Eyez” which, according to the box, are spooky and have an “oozing sour center”.  We all know how appealing it is to eat eyeballs, and if they have oozing sour centers, well…who wouldn’t want to try that?  So, I bought a pair and took them home for a test run. 

With eyes like that, you’ll think twice before doing any carving on this Jack-O’-Lantern!

Conceptual Soundness:  I think combining jack-o’-lanterns, spooky eyes and gummy bears is a great idea.  The jack-o’-lantern is very seasonal of course, but what would make you think more of Halloween than eating a couple of Eyez?   And this is a perfect time to tip our hats to Herbert Mederer, who, since 1984, has specialized in making all kinds of gummies.  Thanks to his leadership, gummies have become extremely popular in this country, even among folks who don’t insist that their gummies include hemp. It’s a good concept to tie Gummi’s to Halloween, so I’ll give it the full 4 points.   

Appearance of the Treat:  First off, using a jack-o’-lantern as the packaging for the Eyez is the perfect presentation for the season.  Each eye looks very realistic, with a white sclera and a green eyeball.  While only a small portion of people have green eyes, the green creates a perfect look for Halloween. I do think they could have made the eyes bloodshot, so I’m going to give it 3.5 points for appearance.

Taste:  As you saw, the packaging makes a point of saying that the Eyez have “oozing sour centers”.  Well, they do have sour centers which are cherry flavor, but they don’t ooze (which would lend more authenticity to it since I’m guessing the red center, along with being cherry, is supposed to represent blood).  And the centers are only a little sour, which was a surprise and a little bit disappointing.  Since it’s a Gummi, it does have the spongy feel of what you imagine a real eyeball would feel like, so thumbs up for that.  As a Gummi treat, it was pretty tasty. I’m going to give it 3 points for taste.

There’s nothing like a tasty eyeball to top off a great meal!

Value:  One package of two Gummi Eyez is only $2.95, which I think is a heck of a deal!  When you think about how expensive it is to buy…well, anything anymore, $2.95 for a scary Halloween treat has to rank as one of the better values you’ll find anywhere.  I’m going to give it 4 points for value.

Total Treat Score: 14.5 points/16 points.  I suggest that, if you’re anywhere near El Dorado Hills, visit Nibblers and pick up your own set of Gummi Eyez.  (You can also buy Herbert’s Best treats on Amazon, but that’s way too easy)!

Uncategorized

Dime-Store Delicacy

Before we launch into today’s review, let me share a spooky discovery that’s appropriate for the season.

I am currently visiting the town of Mendocino (pop: 731) on California’s northern coast. Today I happened upon a forlorn place called Evergreen Cemetery. Despite its lush-sounding name, Evergreen occupies a couple of dusty acres of arid land and dead weeds on the edge of town.

Nevergreen” Cemetery. (I decided to present my photo in black and white to make it spookier.)

Off to one side of the cemetery is an interesting grave marker: It’s a stone column maybe three feet in diameter, which has the appearance of being truncated by some kind of earthquake or act of vandalism. Upon closer inspection, it seems the marker was designed merely to look like the top had broken off. I guess it was an artistic choice.

Broken Baluster

The inscription on the marker reads:

Cinderella P. Rueckert

Died

Oct. 7, 1921

Now that’s an interesting name, on an interesting marker, for someone who died almost exactly 103 years ago. I figured I’d research the back story.

I couldn’t find her obit; just this legal notice she placed as “executrix” after her husband died.

It seems Cinderella was her real name (her mother is said to have been a fan of fairy tales), and she was born in 1840 (exact date unknown) in Illinois (city unknown). She came to Mendocino and married a watchman at the local sawmill in 1875. She was widowed in 1888, and supposedly inherited a small fortune. She spent her remaining 33 years living in a house the street from the cemetery, selling apples from her trees to passersby.

Cinderella’s house still stands today!

Now, here’s the spooky part: She was a ghost! Sort of. We now turn to the Kelley House Museum website for details:

“A Swedish lumberman…liked to use Evergreen Cemetery as a shortcut home from town. He would become inebriated and sing at the top of his lungs in the middle of the night passing Cinderella’s home. She got so irritated she found a newly-dug grave awaiting a burial service the next day, bedecked herself in a sheet, then crouched in the grave awaiting the wandering drunk. She popped out of the grave whooping and screaming, and you can be sure the man never shortcut through the graveyard again.”

Let me end with a photo from the back deck of my hotel. I tell you, this is one of the eeriest towns I’ve visited outside of Pennsylvania!

Now it’s time to get down to business. Today we’re checking out the “Happy Halloween Russell Stover Pumpkin Caramel.” Or at least that’s how I read the jumble of words scattered across the packaging.

Alert readers will recall that we’ve examined Russell Stover “confections” in the past. But this Caramel version seems to have escaped our notice. Until now. Let’s apply our rating rubric!

Conceptual Soundness: Russell Stover Candies began in 1923 as “Mrs. Stover’s Bungalow Candies,” and specialized in selling boxed chocolates brings bargain prices. This was just two years after See’s Candy was launched. I can’t find any information about their rivalry, but I’ve always felt that Russell Stover’s is the cheaper, everyman candy. Where See’s sells through an exclusive network of their own stores, Russell Stover’s seems to be available at every drugstore in the country. That in itself would appear to be a legit marketing strategy, trading exclusivity for ubiquity.

Mrs. Stover’s actual bungalow, in Kansas City, around 1930.

This particular candy is part of Russell Stover’s pumpkin series. They are chocolate pumpkin shapes filled with different kinds of gooey candy. They are clearly marketed for Halloween, sold individually at a reasonable price, and decorated with an illustration of a smiling jack o’lantern. Overall, it’s a solid concept. 4 points.

Appearance of the Treat: It’s your standard Russell Stover’s foil packaging. It features a nose-less, buck-toothed pumpkin with an expression like Don Knotts in his dotage. It’s not exactly an image suitable for Rod Serling’s Night Gallery, but it is colorful and evocative of Halloween.

But then you remove the packaging and are faced with the candy itself. I know I’ve ranted about this in the past, but it bears repeating: there is an inexcusable, possibly criminal, disconnect between the image on the package and the actual product within. This brown blob is evocative of meconium. 1 point.

Taste. I have to admit, this is a toothsome Halloween candy. There’s a satisfying crack of the chocolate shell when you first bite into it, and then there’s the pleasant mouthfeel as you masticate the chocolate together with the caramel filling. That caramel is surprisingly tasty, without the chemical notes that one often associates with cheap drugstore candy. It’s got a bit of a Snickers vibe going on, without the nuts. I’ll give it 3.5 points.

Value. These are a buck each at our local CVS. What other chocolate-adjacent candy product could you get for that price? Most of the similar candies weigh in at just ounce, so this gives you 30 percent more candy. I’m sure you’d get tired of eating these all the time, but as a single treat, $1 is a definite bargain. 4 points.

Total Treat Score: 11.5/16 points

Get one today! Chances are they’re available within walking distance of wherever you are!